Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Go down

Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by sbtzc on Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:28 pm

I've been a long time user of CCI SV with decent groups and very few problems. Yes, I know you shouldn't mess with what works, but I'm wondering about less expensive standard velocity ammunition. Specifically has anyone had any experience with Armscor, Federal Champion Target or Fiocchi?

Aguila produces a little larger groupings and an occasional failure to feed for me.


Last edited by sbtzc on Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:42 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : fix)
avatar
sbtzc

Posts : 48
Join date : 2013-05-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by Wobbley on Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:36 pm

Fiocchi Subsonic HP works for me.
avatar
Wobbley

Posts : 1512
Join date : 2015-02-13

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by zanemoseley on Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:38 pm

I just got a case of CCI SV delivered for under $310, that just over $.06 a shot, why mess with what works.

zanemoseley

Posts : 654
Join date : 2015-07-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by sbtzc on Fri Dec 29, 2017 9:02 pm

zanemoseley wrote:I just got a case of CCI SV delivered for under $310, that just over $.06 a shot, why mess with what works.

Please share Smile
avatar
sbtzc

Posts : 48
Join date : 2013-05-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by Jack H on Fri Dec 29, 2017 10:43 pm

Armscore goes bang.  That's about all. 

But I usually can tell a good shot even if it is with crappy ammo.
avatar
Jack H

Posts : 1523
Join date : 2011-06-10
Location : Oregon

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by zanemoseley on Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:35 pm

sbtzc wrote:
zanemoseley wrote:I just got a case of CCI SV delivered for under $310, that just over $.06 a shot, why mess with what works.

Please share Smile

http://www.officerstore.com/mobile/store/product.aspx/productId/27879/CCI-22-LR-Standard-Velocity-Ammunition-40-grain-Case-of-5000/

Mine case in 100 round plastic cases too.

zanemoseley

Posts : 654
Join date : 2015-07-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by Chris Miceli on Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:46 pm

ewwwww 0032 plastic box.... not 0035 paper box... but hey i'm gonna order some.
avatar
Chris Miceli

Posts : 2373
Join date : 2015-10-27
Location : Northern Virginia

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by zanemoseley on Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:55 pm

Lol I have an older master shooting buddy the swears the plastic box shoots better. Personally I don't care too much, I do hate how the paper box just has the single layer plastic top. I end up keeping one of the black plastic cradles that SK and other nicer 22's come in, you can drop the paper box tray in that so they all stay put.

zanemoseley

Posts : 654
Join date : 2015-07-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by JKR on Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:53 am

I've been very happy with Aguila Super Extra. Targetsports USA has it for $22/brick. Free shipping on a case. It's running perfect in my Nelson.

Jim

JKR

Posts : 266
Join date : 2015-01-13
Location : Northern Wisconsin

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by troystaten on Sat Dec 30, 2017 4:20 pm

I do like the 100 count boxes but have a large quantity of the 50 round box ammo so I just transfer that to my used 100 count boxes for trips to the range.

troystaten

Posts : 274
Join date : 2012-04-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by LenV on Sat Dec 30, 2017 5:14 pm

troystaten wrote:I do like the 100 count boxes but have a large quantity of the 50 round box ammo so I just transfer that to my used 100 count boxes for trips to the range.
+1 I also transfer to the 100 round plastic. They are 10 times easier to get ammo metered out of during a match.

Len
avatar
LenV

Posts : 3037
Join date : 2014-01-24
Age : 68
Location : Oregon

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by 1joel1 on Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:15 am

If you're in California, I hope you all have stocked up. For now, since Jan1, we can't buy any ammo statewide. You need an ammo card and they aren't available yet.

Joel

1joel1

Posts : 145
Join date : 2012-11-09

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by zanemoseley on Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:40 am

Maybe you guys need to make a New Years resolution,,,, move to a new state.

zanemoseley

Posts : 654
Join date : 2015-07-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by jglenn21 on Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:12 pm

at one time I believe the CCI plastic 100 box ammo was made at a different factory from the paper box stuff... today ..same factory
avatar
jglenn21

Posts : 1362
Join date : 2015-04-07
Age : 70
Location : monroe , ga

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by oldsalt444 on Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:17 pm

If you get a Type 03 FFL (curio & relic) and a California Certificate of Eligibility (COE), then you can still have ammo shipped to your door.  LAX Ammo, being in CA understands this, but as usual other places won't bother to understand our complicated and convoluted guns laws and won't ship to CA.
avatar
oldsalt444

Posts : 108
Join date : 2011-10-27
Location : Commiefornia

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by Bullseye_Stan on Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:31 pm

I noticed California has not abolished the infamous 'gun shows'.  The last one I went to in November had the Aguila standard velocity ammo at $210/case.  Since the case weights ~ 40 lb, I decided not to lug that out to my car and opt for mail order instead - since it's an option.  I've yet to buy a case.

I've bought cases of .22lr target ammo out of state.  I think there may be a law in Virginia that if you say the .22lr ammo is for a pistol, you need to show an ID at purchase - but that may just be for Walmart's in certain cities.  Politics is so very goofy.

Bullseye_Stan

Posts : 274
Join date : 2017-06-11
Location : Hampton Roads, VA

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by Wobbley on Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:43 pm

They like the revenue too much. The venues like the fees and the counties like the sales tax.
avatar
Wobbley

Posts : 1512
Join date : 2015-02-13

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by john bickar on Mon Jan 01, 2018 7:32 pm

oldsalt444 wrote:If you get a Type 03 FFL (curio & relic) and a California Certificate of Eligibility (COE), then you can still have ammo shipped to your door.  LAX Ammo, being in CA understands this, but as usual other places won't bother to understand our complicated and convoluted guns laws and won't ship to CA.

Bob, I have heard that this is the case but haven't seen anything definitive yet. If the ammo vendors won't ship, it's a moot point.

I stocked up a bit on .22 in order to wait out the inevitable CA DOJ CF.
avatar
john bickar

Posts : 929
Join date : 2011-07-09
Location : Menlo Park, CA

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by PMcfall on Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:41 am

This is a question that has always puzzled me.  We pour a lot of money into our pistols seeking superior accuracy, then we try to feed it cheap ammo????  Where does that make any sense?
Phil
avatar
PMcfall

Posts : 73
Join date : 2011-06-16
Location : St. Joseph, MO

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by Bullseye_Stan on Tue Jan 02, 2018 11:08 am

The only thing I would be concerned about is the average velocity.  Most standard velocity ammo is under 1200 fps.  Some closer to 1000 fps.  Gun manufacturers do not specify a brand and type of ammunition (generally) but some specify standard velocity only. 

As an example, back in the 70's (before the EPA shut down all the JROTC indoor ranges) we shot Remington 40x and a few Anschutz rifles.  This was sponsored by the ROTC program, and the ammunition provided by them.  That ammunition was typically Winchester Wildcat with some T22 mixed.  It was never a problem.  Of course, these were single shot bolt action rifles and I dare say some of the higher end Anschutz with the 54 actions would shoot ~ 1,000,000 rounds before accuracy dropped on an indoor range.

Bullseye_Stan

Posts : 274
Join date : 2017-06-11
Location : Hampton Roads, VA

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by orpheoet on Tue Jan 02, 2018 1:35 pm

JKR wrote:I've been very happy with Aguila Super Extra. Targetsports USA has it for $22/brick. Free shipping on a case. It's running perfect in my Nelson.

Jim
This stuff runs flawlessly in my S&W41, High Standard M107, and Hämmerli 280. Seems almost as accurate as CCI SV indoors.
avatar
orpheoet

Posts : 685
Join date : 2014-07-29
Age : 50
Location : Lakewood, Oh

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by rreid on Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:18 pm

PMcfall wrote:This is a question that has always puzzled me.  We pour a lot of money into our pistols seeking superior accuracy, then we try to feed it cheap ammo????  Where does that make any sense?
Phil
If a case of Tenex is $2000 and a box of Federal Gold Medal 45 is $40, the ammo ends up costing more than gun.
avatar
rreid

Posts : 402
Join date : 2012-02-06

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by MarkOue on Wed Jan 03, 2018 4:15 pm

For practice I shoot Norma Tac-22.  It's cheap and better than holds the 10 ring at 50 yards.  It's usually right on call.  

For matches I shoot Eley Target that I bought cheap.  The Eley shoots just a little more accurate in the Ransom Rest than does the Tac-22.  

An expensive and accurate gun won't loose much value and will provide a lifetime of service as I use it to increase my skills.  I will use more accurate ammo in matches when my skills are equal to it and the gun.  For me that will be when I average 95 or better at slow fire.

MarkOue

Posts : 125
Join date : 2016-08-07
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by Tangeant on Tue Jan 23, 2018 7:13 pm

PMcfall wrote:This is a question that has always puzzled me.  We pour a lot of money into our pistols seeking superior accuracy, then we try to feed it cheap ammo????  Where does that make any sense?
Phil
 Indoors 50 ft / OD 25 yd that $2.25 per box Aguila will shoot a clean target just like a $23 box of Eley Tenex. why waste a huge amount of money for maybe a few more X's unless you are a 890+ shooting HM.

BOT.

I've found TAC-22 and Fiocchi SV to run and shoot very good for me in my Benelli. Still hard to beat the CCI SV sale prices < 300 case and Aguilla SV for cost.
avatar
Tangeant

Posts : 6
Join date : 2015-11-03

Back to top Go down

Aquila Super Fine SV

Post by Dipnet on Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:33 am

A friend gave me a box of Aquila Super Fine SV (1130 fps) to try in my Pardini and I liked it so much that I just bought my second case, $219 delivered (Aquila SV). The stiff is very accurate (better than CCI in my Pardini) and slightly faster than most other SV ammo. The only complaint, and it is not really a complaint, is the ammo is slightly dirtier than commonly used target stuff. Cheers, dipnet
avatar
Dipnet

Posts : 132
Join date : 2014-06-09
Location : Gainesville, Florida

Back to top Go down

Re: Less expensive SV .22 experience?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum