Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by valbern67 on Sun 13 Oct 2019 - 14:02

My wife is looking to sell her Ruger Mk IV Lite (because it's too light!! Laughing)

I'm researching other options for her and wonder if anyone has done a comparison of the Browning Buck Mark Field Target and Ruger Mk IV Target?

She's really a plinker, so we're looking for a reliable .22 that won't break the bank. She'll shoot with an Ultradout mounted on it.

Thanks!

Val

alien
valbern67
valbern67

Posts : 112
Join date : 2018-09-04
Location : Clifton, NJ

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by kjanracing on Sun 13 Oct 2019 - 15:05

Have her try both and buy what she likes. I can’t imagine a wrong choice here.
kjanracing
kjanracing

Posts : 265
Join date : 2015-02-17
Location : Arvada, Colorado

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by Asa Yam on Sun 13 Oct 2019 - 15:46

Various discussions online - consensus is that the Mk IV has the advantage in takedown.  Most threads note Ruger has more gunsmiths and aftermarket accessories available.  Unfortunately, this includes scope mount bases (expect to spend $15-30).
Mk IVs are available with aluminum and stainless steel lower receivers.  If low weight is an issue, assume you are looking for a stainless one.  Buckmark lower receivers are all aluminum.

Triggers - Not sure if the Mk IV Target requires trigger work.  The Buckmark requires little trigger work.

Fit and feel - this is important.  Does your wife like the MK IV grip feel?  (Size, shape, and grip angle.)  Or does she prefer the Buckmark Field Target grip?

Bottom line: Sounds like a "Try before you buy" is in order.  Find a way to borrow/rent examples of both pistols, ideally for a side by side comparison.

Link to one online comparison:  https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/22lr-pistol-showdown-browning-buck-mark-vs-ruger-mark-series/

Asa

Asa Yam

Posts : 24
Join date : 2018-09-15

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by LenV on Sun 13 Oct 2019 - 20:15

I have both. I like shooting the Buckmark more then the Mk4 for the simple reason that the Mk4 is too darn heavy up front. I had a quick trigger job done on both of them by Roddy Toyota so both triggers are great. All the Buckmark needed was labor. The Mk4 had a Mk2 trigger upgrade. When Roddy did the trigger job on the Ruger he offered to knock some of the barrel off. I should of taken him up on it. I'm not a little person but I find it fatiguing. The Mk2 (middle pistol) feels a lot better balanced. YMMV

Len

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? 20190126
LenV
LenV

Posts : 3808
Join date : 2014-01-25
Age : 69
Location : Oregon

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by mspingeld on Sun 13 Oct 2019 - 20:37

LenV, the Mk IV in the picture looks to be the Mark IV Competition which is listed at 45.8 oz. The Mark IV Target is a few ounces lighter at 42.8. Val, the Lite is only 25 oz.

Maybe the Target is a better option? Would likely need a Volquartsen trigger upgrade. Sorry, I don't know anything about Buckmark triggers.

mspingeld

Posts : 472
Join date : 2014-04-19
Age : 59
Location : New Jersey

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by chiz1180 on Sun 13 Oct 2019 - 21:35

Big fan of my Buckmark (medallion model). The trigger actually is fairly good stock, fairly easy to lower the pull weight a bit with the sear spring flip. Mark IV will be easier to take down and clean, especially with a scope rail. At the time I was able to buy my Buckmark for a bit less than a Ruger, but ballpark should be close. Probably hard to go wrong with either one.

chiz1180

Posts : 15
Join date : 2019-05-29

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by R.Moran on Mon 14 Oct 2019 - 15:32

I'm pretty happy with the two Buckmarks I have. Dave Sams tuned the triggers on both. I'm not a BE competitor like y'all...but from a casual rest it stacks cci SV pretty well...anything out is on me.

I've had two Ruger MKII Gov models...sold one years ago, and more recently had one that was a problem child..function issues and not particularly accurate.

One thing about the BM is the barrel swap. No need to send the gun off to do so. Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? 20190510

R.Moran

Posts : 11
Join date : 2019-08-21

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by jstanfield103 on Mon 14 Oct 2019 - 22:10

The BuckMark is a great pistol and you could not go wrong with either. Only Browning I own now is a Challenger II, great pistol. I have had BuckMarks in the past and another one is on my short list. I have two Ruger Mark IV. This is the way I see them.

Ruger Mark IV
1. Easy Take down, no tools and can be taken down and back together in less than 30 seconds.
2. If Stainless Steel the complete pistol is all steel.
3. 3rd party upgrades every where, anything you want to do with them.
4. Heavier trigger out of the box, but not super heavy.
5. Most people figure on another $100 dollar to get a great trigger on up grades. 2lb. trigger
6. Ruger customer service is one of the best in the industry. Very customer oriented.
7. Will eat every thing that you can find in 22lr. ammo except maybe CB's (low power)
8. Don't remember ever having a misfire that was not bulk bad ammo (bad primer)

Browning BuckMark

1. Good trigger out of the box. No extra cost.
2. Aluminum Frame
3. Not as much 3rd party parts out there but there are parts available.
4. Will also eat everything that you put in the magazine that's 22lr.
5. Several models just like the Ruger's
6. Takes an Allen wrench to take apart. Possible of crossing threads or wearing them. But probably not to worry.

To me these are just a preference gun. Can not go wrong with either one. I put these two brands in a class above the others including the S&W Victory. Would not consider the others
jstanfield103
jstanfield103

Posts : 46
Join date : 2019-03-10

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by adminbot1911 on Tue 15 Oct 2019 - 10:54

I don't know how the MkIV fares.  I much prefer shooting my MkII to my Buckmark, though.  The trigger on the MkII is fantastic thanks to Volquartsen.

They're both inexpensive pistols, buy them both and sell the one that you like less.  Someone will buy it.
adminbot1911
adminbot1911

Posts : 304
Join date : 2019-05-17

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by rich.tullo on Tue 12 Nov 2019 - 1:53

Buck Mark Field target is the one to get. They do not have much after market parts but they do not need much. Frame is a little thich so if you wife has small hand then tshe should get the 22 45. Cheap and it is a 1911 grip angle. No need to get the Competition, Ruger 5 inch barrels shoot plenty good.
rich.tullo
rich.tullo

Posts : 1118
Join date : 2015-03-27

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by LenV on Tue 12 Nov 2019 - 3:29

I choose the Buckmark Hunter because of its frame. Almost all of the older Buckmark parts will fit. This older pair of Nills fit with about 3 minutes of work inside the right side grip. The grips didn't make it lighter but it won't be confused with hunting pistol.

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? 20190331

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? 20190332
LenV
LenV

Posts : 3808
Join date : 2014-01-25
Age : 69
Location : Oregon

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by David R on Tue 12 Nov 2019 - 9:37

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? 20191111
Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? 20191110

50 yardgroups. I only shot two groups.

Its a 1995 Buckmark with stock barrel and Valquartsen hammer and sear spring upgrade..

David
David R
David R

Posts : 187
Join date : 2018-12-10
Age : 59

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by 45ACP223 on Tue 12 Nov 2019 - 21:51

I had a buck mark std. bull barrel version from the early 90's I purchased at a gun show for $125.  It took me from Marksman to Expert, and I shot my first Master score with it.  All I did was add some skateboard tape to the front strap and down the road I had to replace a tiny spring (can't remember what it did, but it wore out.  It was a great 22, but after I found a HS Victor, I traded it straight up for a TC Contender 44 Mag, a deal I couldn't resist.  I'm finally getting around to getting a backup for the Victor, a Nelson conversion for the 1911.  Hoping the Nelson becomes my fav, as I love the 1911 feel and balance.  You can't go wrong with either, but I would probably go with the Ruger Mark IV, ease of takedown, lots of aftermarket support.  I thought the SS target model was too heavy, I liked the blued target model and the grip angle of the 22/45.  I didn't care for the 22/45 polymer frame, wish there was an option for steel.
45ACP223
45ACP223

Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-04-30
Location : Fl

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by rich.tullo on Tue 12 Nov 2019 - 22:13

Mark IV need a lot of work to make them excellent. Browning if they feel right for you are GTG out the box, The Field Target Model is the best one.
rich.tullo
rich.tullo

Posts : 1118
Join date : 2015-03-27

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by 45ACP223 on Wed 13 Nov 2019 - 17:06

Ask and you will see many different opinions.  Ruger used to be the go to 22 for entry into bullseye shooting.  We had a master shooting one at our club until he switched to Hammerli.  You can't go wrong with either one.  I like the looks and feel of the Buckmark but the Ruger Mark IV is a nice alternative.  It basically comes down to how they both feel in your hand.  If you know of an indoor range that rents them, try before you buy.
45ACP223
45ACP223

Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-04-30
Location : Fl

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by LenV on Sun 17 Nov 2019 - 23:49

I had to dig thru some targets I had here to find some Kimber targets I was looking for. I found this target while looking. It was my sight in target when I put the Sightron on it. It didn't need much.

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Buckma10
LenV
LenV

Posts : 3808
Join date : 2014-01-25
Age : 69
Location : Oregon

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by BE Mike on Mon 18 Nov 2019 - 10:50

The only complaint I have about the Browning, that hasn't been mentioned, is that when they change a style, they change magazine designs and abandon the production of the previous magazines.
BE Mike
BE Mike

Posts : 1682
Join date : 2011-07-29
Location : Indiana

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by Aprilian on Mon 18 Nov 2019 - 12:30

Mike, I believe there have only been 3 versions of Browning magazines from the 1958 Challenger to today's Buckmark.   That is excluding the browning 1911 style pistols and other models that are not direct descendants of the Challenger.  

I call the three versions;
Heel cut
Narrow foot
Wide foot
Aprilian
Aprilian

Posts : 783
Join date : 2016-05-13
Location : Minnesota

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by BE Mike on Mon 18 Nov 2019 - 15:02

Aprilian wrote:Mike, I believe there have only been 3 versions of Browning magazines from the 1958 Challenger to today's Buckmark.   That is excluding the browning 1911 style pistols and other models that are not direct descendants of the Challenger.  

I call the three versions;
Heel cut
Narrow foot
Wide foot
If that means that there are plenty of magazines available for the Browning Buckmarks then I withdraw my small complaint.
BE Mike
BE Mike

Posts : 1682
Join date : 2011-07-29
Location : Indiana

Back to top Go down

Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target? Empty Re: Browning Buck Mark Field Target vs. Ruger Mk IV Target?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum