Vectan BA10 vs titegroup vs WST

Go down

Vectan BA10 vs titegroup vs WST

Post by 10sandxs on 12/26/2018, 7:33 pm

Finally drained my ba10 stock and tried titegroup. 3.3 gr ba10 vs 3.0, 3.5 and 4.0 gr titegroup.

Gun: caspian frame/slide, kart barrel. FRAME mount dot 14 lb recoil spring

3.0 and 3.5 needed 11 lb spring to cycle, but were butter soft to shoot... 4.0 cycled  briskly and shot softer than 3.3 of ba 10. Accuracy was acceptable (99-5 tf) at 50' I'm going to try 3.6 and 3.8 to see how low it will cycle. Once I have that, I'll do some ransom rest work.

Found a pound of wst today so will report those as well...


Last edited by 10sandxs on 12/27/2018, 7:50 pm; edited 1 time in total

10sandxs

Posts : 228
Join date : 2016-01-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Vectan BA10 vs titegroup vs WST

Post by 10sandxs on 12/27/2018, 7:49 pm

Load data
NOE 170 gr long nose SWC powder coated
3.3 gr vectan BA10
3.6 gr WST (picture is wrong)
3.8 gr Titegroup
.468 crimp

Five rounds of WST/TG mixed with 5 rounds of BA10. 
Two 5 shot strings of TF.

TG and WST both significantly softer than BA10. TG had noticeable more noise and muzzel flash, but not unbearable. WST has more particulate than TG. BA10 has very fine carbon particulate.

I'll shot either WST or TG over BA10
Attachments
2018-12-27 19.34.45.jpg You don't have permission to download attachments.(256 Kb) Downloaded 9 times
2018-12-27 19.33.56.jpg You don't have permission to download attachments.(250 Kb) Downloaded 9 times
2018-12-27 19.48.46.jpg You don't have permission to download attachments.(189 Kb) Downloaded 2 times

10sandxs

Posts : 228
Join date : 2016-01-29

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum